Upcoming Webinar: October, 8th 2020 @ 12:30 PM (EDT)  |  Criminal Considerations for Workplace Investigations  |
Register Today!

Serious insight for serious situations.

Serious insight for serious situations.

Insights

Reflections and news direct from Rubin Thomlinson.
Subscribe to receive updates of interest to you.

Filtered By:

A Few Words About Workplace Violence Risk Assessments Under Bill 168

For those of you following the progress of Bill 168, which proposes to add explicit protections for employees against workplace violence and harassment, you will know that one of the trickier elements of the Bill is the requirement that employers perform a risk assessment of the workplace. The purpose of this assessment is to determine

Read More

Just ‘Fess Up!

I was thinking this past week about the FIFA world cup qualifying match between France and Ireland. If you haven’t heard, France won after their captain allegedly handled the ball, resulting in the winning goal. Irish fans were irate that the captain of the French team did not admit his alleged violation. In the workplace,

Read More

Supreme Court: May Be Necessary for Dismissed Employees to Return to the Same Employer to Satisfy Duty to Mitigate

According to the Supreme Court of Canada, it may be necessary for a dismissed employee to mitigate his or her damages by returning to work for the same employer. In a case released just yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada has added a new and interesting element to the mix of termination options for employers. 

Read More

Notice Not Always Proportionate to Service in Case of Short Service Employee

A recent case involving the termination of a short service employee, illustrates a principle that is often difficult for employers to accept.  A terminated employee’s entitlement to reasonable notice may not always be proportionate to his or her notice. The case in point is Gingerich v. Kobe Sportswear Inc. (unreported, January 25, 2008).  Here, Mr.

Read More

Supreme Court of Canada Hears Honda v. Keays

Today, the Supreme Court of Canada heard submissions in what is arguably the most important employment law case in over a decade, Honda v. Keays.  At issue are the legal consequences of firing an employee with a disability – in this case chronic fatigue syndrome.  As part of the company’s disability management program, Honda required

Read More

Restrictive Covenants That “Stick”

This week, we continue to look back at noteworthy 2007 employment law cases.  For people who are interested in the duties imposed on departing employees, have a look at H.L. Staebler Co. v. Allan [2007] O.J. No. 3460, a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  The case revolved around whether an employer’s restrictive

Read More

Frustration

One of the more interesting trends in the 2007 case law was a number of cases in which judges considered whether an employee’s contract of employment had become “frustrated” due to illness and disability. “Frustration” is an old legal concept taken from the law of contracts. It sets out the circumstances when one party to

Read More

Welcome to RTLaw@Work

Happy New Year and welcome to the first edition of RTLaw@Work, Rubin Thomlinson’s weekly blog on new and noteworthy employment law cases. We could not say goodbye to 2007, without mentioning our favourite case of the year, Mercey v. Consolidated Recycling [2007] O.J. No. 3608 (QL). This decision was released in September, and is still

Read More

Complementary Webinars

We recognize that people are at home and trying to find ways to stay connected and up to date on current issues. We want you to have the tools you need to maintain a safe, healthy, and effective workplace environment.